What Does In Reviewer Agreement Mean
The “Waiting for Reviewers” status implies that the publisher is looking for peer reviewers for your journal. In the case of a revised submission, the document is generally returned to the same group of reviewers who originally reviewed it. In your case, however, it seems that the publisher is trying to look for new reviews for your manuscript. There may be two possible reasons for this. Maybe the editor wants a new perspective on your paper and therefore intends to send it to a new group of critics. The other reason might be that auditors who originally checked your document are currently unavailable. This is the scene in which the editors will try to receive your manuscript as quickly as possible. If your manuscript is at this point, there are enough experts who have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just have to wait for the reviewers to return their comments before a decision can be made. Let`s translate them. There are many different deposit systems and the phases that a manuscript passes during peer review differ system-vers-system (and actually journal to journal), so, for the purposes of this article, we will consider the most common steps of the most common filing page: ScholarOne (formal Manuscript Central). Thank you so much for an overview. I filed my second paper on ScholarOne on Wednesday.
The first up to a total of 6 months, but ended up ending in an accept (and my first scientific publication, yay!), now this second went to “Waiting Reviewer Assignment” in 4 days. Does this mean that I`ve already walked past a desk and the paper is checked? This means that they have invited critics who have refused the invitation and invited new ones who have not yet accepted or declined the invitation. Methodological and statistical criteria vary depending on the type of study reported in the summary. For example, the criteria for verifying statistics and methodology differ between randomized controlled and qualitative studies. During the development of the system, content experts studied the facial validity criteria for each design of the research.